영어 문항 출제자 목표인데 난이도 평가 좀
ebs 소재 연계한 지문임 ㅇㅇ
Some theorists in meta-ethics have recently defended so-called 'meta-ethical pluralism', which denies that ordinary moral discourse is uniform, instead claiming that it contains several different concepts of morality. But critics have objected that such a theory cannot adequately explain both moral and meta-ethical disagreement, because the use of, or focus on, different concepts, respectively, means that speakers in these contexts would frequently end up talking past each other instead of having a genuine disagreement. In response, I will argue that, in both cases, pluralism leaves more room for disagreement than its critics have thought: in ordinary moral discourse, speakers could still (__________). And that undermines any immediate inference from the presence of disagreement to the falsity of pluralism.
① disagree about content that is communicated as a matter of pragmatics rather than semantics
② agree on the significance of communicating about moral matters
③ reach a consensus through shared experiences of moral education
④ interact successfully by means of logical inference in a dialogue
⑤ show explicit evidence by citing real case studies
난이도나 선지같은거 봐주셈 정답은
1번임
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
기출생각집 수1 수2 5주만에 가능할까요? 하루에 수학 2~3시간 매일
-
5주만에 기출 1회독 끝낼 생각인데 기출생각집 풀지 기출 5개년 돌릴지 고민되서요 어떤게 나을까요?
-
지금 고2고 정시 준비하고있는학생인데 지금 김기현 쌤 수1 아이디어하고 수2...
첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.